A137 Wave Multiplier
okay wetterberg, audio is waiting for ya
My first modular demo, haven't felt moved to bother before but I think this itsterest. Hopefully this works:
A137 CV mangling monkeyshit
The RS90 as an LFO is going to the A137 and the CV ouput is modulating the M15 and M12 filter. the A137 is being modulated by the the M15 and RS90 and by itself. There is a bit of cross modulating between the VCOs but most of what your hearing is a pretty simple LFO made very complex by the A137
I moved the freq knobs on the VCOs and filter around a little for these performances
Richard
My first modular demo, haven't felt moved to bother before but I think this itsterest. Hopefully this works:
A137 CV mangling monkeyshit
The RS90 as an LFO is going to the A137 and the CV ouput is modulating the M15 and M12 filter. the A137 is being modulated by the the M15 and RS90 and by itself. There is a bit of cross modulating between the VCOs but most of what your hearing is a pretty simple LFO made very complex by the A137
I moved the freq knobs on the VCOs and filter around a little for these performances
Richard
Last edited by richard on Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:27 pm, edited 8 times in total.
- wetterberg
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 7673
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:31 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
- wetterberg
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 7673
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:31 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
- wetterberg
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 7673
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:31 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
-
Epignosis567
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am
SECONDED. Anyone else have this problem? Wondering if I got a defective unit.richard wrote:I need to point out that at least on my A-137 these settings don't actually work.
Multiples....Fully to the left (0 marks)
Folding level....fully to the left (0 marks)
Symmetry...3.5 marks from fully left
Harmonics.... 2 marks from fully left
Level....2 marks from fully left.
If I input a sine form an m15 the signal is noticebly folded even at the lowest level - I can't find any useful default setting. The only wayI can find to try to get a sine through it unaffected is to attenuate the signal level so low that the signal disappears
Richard
- authorless
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 2597
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:41 am
- Location: Wilmington, NC
If you have the fold level set really low like this then the signal is going to fold at a really low level. If you want a default with no folding: Multiples: 0/fully counter clockwise; Fold Level: max/fully clockwise; Symmetry: 5/middle; Harmonics: 0/fully counter clockwise. Level not all the way up, adjust to where it sounds correct.Epignosis567 wrote:SECONDED. Anyone else have this problem? Wondering if I got a defective unit.richard wrote:I need to point out that at least on my A-137 these settings don't actually work.
Multiples....Fully to the left (0 marks)
Folding level....fully to the left (0 marks)
Symmetry...3.5 marks from fully left
Harmonics.... 2 marks from fully left
Level....2 marks from fully left.
If I input a sine form an m15 the signal is noticebly folded even at the lowest level - I can't find any useful default setting. The only wayI can find to try to get a sine through it unaffected is to attenuate the signal level so low that the signal disappears
Richard
"Wait a month and buy from a fellow wiggler who's desperate for new modules." - Johnisfaster
"It's oscillators are so precise and lifeless it's actually a digital modelling analog synth." - nadafarms
"It's oscillators are so precise and lifeless it's actually a digital modelling analog synth." - nadafarms
-
Epignosis567
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am
Yes, this is what I have been getting an ALMOST unaffected signal with, but really it's still pretty damn mangled when looked at under a scope. Anyone else able to chime in? The notion of getting a signal to pass through this thing unaffected is crazy to me and not possible on mine, so I would like to be sure I don't have a defective module.authorless wrote:
If you have the fold level set really low like this then the signal is going to fold at a really low level. If you want a default with no folding: Multiples: 0/fully counter clockwise; Fold Level: max/fully clockwise; Symmetry: 5/middle; Harmonics: 0/fully counter clockwise. Level not all the way up, adjust to where it sounds correct.
- authorless
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 2597
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:41 am
- Location: Wilmington, NC
Turn down the input signal.Epignosis567 wrote:Yes, this is what I have been getting an ALMOST unaffected signal with, but really it's still pretty damn mangled when looked at under a scope. Anyone else able to chime in? The notion of getting a signal to pass through this thing unaffected is crazy to me and not possible on mine, so I would like to be sure I don't have a defective module.authorless wrote:
If you have the fold level set really low like this then the signal is going to fold at a really low level. If you want a default with no folding: Multiples: 0/fully counter clockwise; Fold Level: max/fully clockwise; Symmetry: 5/middle; Harmonics: 0/fully counter clockwise. Level not all the way up, adjust to where it sounds correct.
"Wait a month and buy from a fellow wiggler who's desperate for new modules." - Johnisfaster
"It's oscillators are so precise and lifeless it's actually a digital modelling analog synth." - nadafarms
"It's oscillators are so precise and lifeless it's actually a digital modelling analog synth." - nadafarms
-
Epignosis567
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am
Thanks butauthorless wrote:
Turn down the input signal.
Since you have a scope you should be able to get some useful settings out of it with an hour or two of experimenting. Here's what works for me:
(0 is all the way to the left, 10 all the way to the right)
Input level on 2
Multiples at 0
Folding Level at 4
Symmetry at 4
Harmonics at 1
That's clean(ish) and turning up or CVing the multiples increases the folding from subtle to strong. Harmonics further increases the folding effect. You're not having "issues", the wavefolder is just wavefolding. If you want something that's more plug'n'play, the wavefolder on the disting is very nice and straightforward. Maybe the module just isn't for you.
(0 is all the way to the left, 10 all the way to the right)
Input level on 2
Multiples at 0
Folding Level at 4
Symmetry at 4
Harmonics at 1
That's clean(ish) and turning up or CVing the multiples increases the folding from subtle to strong. Harmonics further increases the folding effect. You're not having "issues", the wavefolder is just wavefolding. If you want something that's more plug'n'play, the wavefolder on the disting is very nice and straightforward. Maybe the module just isn't for you.
You have the original signal ... at the input of the module. Whatever the settings on the module, the signal goes through 4 folding stages so don't expect it to come out unaltered. Use a mixer or crossfader if you want to go from original to folded and back.Epignosis567 wrote:My point is that there is no point of attenuation in which an original signal can be recovered from this module. And in light of the fact that other posts here have described settings that are so completely out of line with what would be possible to pass on an unaffected signal via my own module I just want to clarify that I’m not the only one having these issues. There is no way to get an unaffected signal to pass through. And I’m wondering if these other posters were to put their own under a scope they wouldn’t realize that it’s the same for them
When Dieter Doepfer is demoing the A-137-1 he is always starting with dialling in settings that let the original waveform pass more or less unchanged ... he didn't say completely unchanged
Something else that might be confusing is the sketch with all the bits and pieces ... because it is not correct. The folding level defines the width of a voltage interval, the symmetry defines where the interval is. So in stead of 'a+b' and 'a-b' it should be 'b+a' and 'b-a' as upper and lower clipping levels (with 'a' being folding level and 'b' symmetry).
And maybe, since the 4 stages of the A-137-1 are all very similar to the A-136, there is an amplification done. It is possible to modify the A-136 to not amplify, don't know if this is possible with the A-137-1 ... so turning down the input level will have to do. (I should ask this on the Doepfer Yahoo group)
Something else that might be confusing is the sketch with all the bits and pieces ... because it is not correct. The folding level defines the width of a voltage interval, the symmetry defines where the interval is. So in stead of 'a+b' and 'a-b' it should be 'b+a' and 'b-a' as upper and lower clipping levels (with 'a' being folding level and 'b' symmetry).
And maybe, since the 4 stages of the A-137-1 are all very similar to the A-136, there is an amplification done. It is possible to modify the A-136 to not amplify, don't know if this is possible with the A-137-1 ... so turning down the input level will have to do. (I should ask this on the Doepfer Yahoo group)
-
Epignosis567
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am

