A137 Wave Multiplier

Cwejman, Doepfer, Erica, MakeNoise, Mutable Instruments, TipTop Audio, Analogue Solutions, and much more! The world’s most popular format.
Be sure to look into OFFICIAL COMPANY FORA as well.
richard
bananaphile
Posts: 7173
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:17 am
Contact:

Post by richard »

okay wetterberg, audio is waiting for ya

My first modular demo, haven't felt moved to bother before but I think this itsterest. Hopefully this works:

A137 CV mangling monkeyshit

The RS90 as an LFO is going to the A137 and the CV ouput is modulating the M15 and M12 filter. the A137 is being modulated by the the M15 and RS90 and by itself. There is a bit of cross modulating between the VCOs but most of what your hearing is a pretty simple LFO made very complex by the A137

I moved the freq knobs on the VCOs and filter around a little for these performances


Richard
Last edited by richard on Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:27 pm, edited 8 times in total.
User avatar
wetterberg
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 7673
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.

Post by wetterberg »

click "post reply" - not quick reply, scroll down a bit to see the "add an attachment" button :)
richard
bananaphile
Posts: 7173
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:17 am
Contact:

Post by richard »

i posted a link above
User avatar
wetterberg
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 7673
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.

Post by wetterberg »

I think you need a different link, that one is to the administrative tools, it needs a login etc.
richard
bananaphile
Posts: 7173
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:17 am
Contact:

Post by richard »

bollocks - I corrected it. it should work now

A137 CV mangling monkeyshit
R
User avatar
wetterberg
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 7673
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.

Post by wetterberg »

that's... pretty mad :omg:
Epignosis567
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am

Post by Epignosis567 »

richard wrote:I need to point out that at least on my A-137 these settings don't actually work.

Multiples....Fully to the left (0 marks)
Folding level....fully to the left (0 marks)
Symmetry...3.5 marks from fully left
Harmonics.... 2 marks from fully left
Level....2 marks from fully left.

If I input a sine form an m15 the signal is noticebly folded even at the lowest level - I can't find any useful default setting. The only wayI can find to try to get a sine through it unaffected is to attenuate the signal level so low that the signal disappears

Richard
SECONDED. Anyone else have this problem? Wondering if I got a defective unit.
User avatar
authorless
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2597
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:41 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Post by authorless »

Epignosis567 wrote:
richard wrote:I need to point out that at least on my A-137 these settings don't actually work.

Multiples....Fully to the left (0 marks)
Folding level....fully to the left (0 marks)
Symmetry...3.5 marks from fully left
Harmonics.... 2 marks from fully left
Level....2 marks from fully left.

If I input a sine form an m15 the signal is noticebly folded even at the lowest level - I can't find any useful default setting. The only wayI can find to try to get a sine through it unaffected is to attenuate the signal level so low that the signal disappears

Richard
SECONDED. Anyone else have this problem? Wondering if I got a defective unit.
If you have the fold level set really low like this then the signal is going to fold at a really low level. If you want a default with no folding: Multiples: 0/fully counter clockwise; Fold Level: max/fully clockwise; Symmetry: 5/middle; Harmonics: 0/fully counter clockwise. Level not all the way up, adjust to where it sounds correct.
"Wait a month and buy from a fellow wiggler who's desperate for new modules." - Johnisfaster

"It's oscillators are so precise and lifeless it's actually a digital modelling analog synth." - nadafarms
Epignosis567
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am

Post by Epignosis567 »

authorless wrote:
If you have the fold level set really low like this then the signal is going to fold at a really low level. If you want a default with no folding: Multiples: 0/fully counter clockwise; Fold Level: max/fully clockwise; Symmetry: 5/middle; Harmonics: 0/fully counter clockwise. Level not all the way up, adjust to where it sounds correct.
Yes, this is what I have been getting an ALMOST unaffected signal with, but really it's still pretty damn mangled when looked at under a scope. Anyone else able to chime in? The notion of getting a signal to pass through this thing unaffected is crazy to me and not possible on mine, so I would like to be sure I don't have a defective module.
User avatar
authorless
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2597
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:41 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Post by authorless »

Epignosis567 wrote:
authorless wrote:
If you have the fold level set really low like this then the signal is going to fold at a really low level. If you want a default with no folding: Multiples: 0/fully counter clockwise; Fold Level: max/fully clockwise; Symmetry: 5/middle; Harmonics: 0/fully counter clockwise. Level not all the way up, adjust to where it sounds correct.
Yes, this is what I have been getting an ALMOST unaffected signal with, but really it's still pretty damn mangled when looked at under a scope. Anyone else able to chime in? The notion of getting a signal to pass through this thing unaffected is crazy to me and not possible on mine, so I would like to be sure I don't have a defective module.
Turn down the input signal.
"Wait a month and buy from a fellow wiggler who's desperate for new modules." - Johnisfaster

"It's oscillators are so precise and lifeless it's actually a digital modelling analog synth." - nadafarms
Epignosis567
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am

Post by Epignosis567 »

authorless wrote:
Turn down the input signal.
Thanks but :sadbanana: I do understand. My point is that there is no point of attenuation in which an original signal can be recovered from this module. And in light of the fact that other posts here have described settings that are so completely out of line with what would be possible to pass on an unaffected signal via my own module I just want to clarify that I’m not the only one having these issues. There is no way to get an unaffected signal to pass through. And I’m wondering if these other posters were to put their own under a scope they wouldn’t realize that it’s the same for them :hmm:
User avatar
MRoyce
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:59 am
Location: Stuttgart

Post by MRoyce »

Since you have a scope you should be able to get some useful settings out of it with an hour or two of experimenting. Here's what works for me:
(0 is all the way to the left, 10 all the way to the right)
Input level on 2
Multiples at 0
Folding Level at 4
Symmetry at 4
Harmonics at 1

That's clean(ish) and turning up or CVing the multiples increases the folding from subtle to strong. Harmonics further increases the folding effect. You're not having "issues", the wavefolder is just wavefolding. If you want something that's more plug'n'play, the wavefolder on the disting is very nice and straightforward. Maybe the module just isn't for you.
User avatar
Rigo
Chief Spam Killer
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:48 am
Location: Belgium

Post by Rigo »

Epignosis567 wrote:My point is that there is no point of attenuation in which an original signal can be recovered from this module. And in light of the fact that other posts here have described settings that are so completely out of line with what would be possible to pass on an unaffected signal via my own module I just want to clarify that I’m not the only one having these issues. There is no way to get an unaffected signal to pass through. And I’m wondering if these other posters were to put their own under a scope they wouldn’t realize that it’s the same for them :hmm:
You have the original signal ... at the input of the module. Whatever the settings on the module, the signal goes through 4 folding stages so don't expect it to come out unaltered. Use a mixer or crossfader if you want to go from original to folded and back.
User avatar
Rigo
Chief Spam Killer
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:48 am
Location: Belgium

Post by Rigo »

When Dieter Doepfer is demoing the A-137-1 he is always starting with dialling in settings that let the original waveform pass more or less unchanged ... he didn't say completely unchanged :miley:

Something else that might be confusing is the sketch with all the bits and pieces ... because it is not correct. The folding level defines the width of a voltage interval, the symmetry defines where the interval is. So in stead of 'a+b' and 'a-b' it should be 'b+a' and 'b-a' as upper and lower clipping levels (with 'a' being folding level and 'b' symmetry).

And maybe, since the 4 stages of the A-137-1 are all very similar to the A-136, there is an amplification done. It is possible to modify the A-136 to not amplify, don't know if this is possible with the A-137-1 ... so turning down the input level will have to do. (I should ask this on the Doepfer Yahoo group)
Epignosis567
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:28 am

Post by Epignosis567 »

Got it, thanks. It's not that I was expecting a signal to be able to pass unchanged, it's that all the OPs here were saying that they could get a signal unchanged with settings that are completely at odds with my own module, that was the point of confusion.
Post Reply

Return to “1U & 3U Eurorack Modules”