5u ring modulators
5u ring modulators
Hi all!
I'm a Spanish dotcom modular user, with some STG modules and a COTK 921b oscillator.
I hear in some places, something obout how good is the ring modulator of VCS3, CS80, Early Korgs... etc.
At this moment, I believed that a ring modulator is a simple device, more simple than a filter (lot of different filters are available today), but I don't know why some people talk about how wonder is this ring modulator or another...
I have an Arrick ring modulator, and I think that is good. Do you know other ring modulators in 5u format, and with different quality? Better one?
Grettings for all!
I'm a Spanish dotcom modular user, with some STG modules and a COTK 921b oscillator.
I hear in some places, something obout how good is the ring modulator of VCS3, CS80, Early Korgs... etc.
At this moment, I believed that a ring modulator is a simple device, more simple than a filter (lot of different filters are available today), but I don't know why some people talk about how wonder is this ring modulator or another...
I have an Arrick ring modulator, and I think that is good. Do you know other ring modulators in 5u format, and with different quality? Better one?
Grettings for all!
You can... you can... Bring feeling!
There's plenty. For starters:
MOTM-190
Oakley Ring Mod
CGS Active Ring Mod
Modcan 07B
YuSynth Dual RM
I only have the MOTM, and I like it fine, but I don't have anything with which to compare it, so I'll leave that commentary to others here.
Welcome to the forum!

MOTM-190
Oakley Ring Mod
CGS Active Ring Mod
Modcan 07B
YuSynth Dual RM
I only have the MOTM, and I like it fine, but I don't have anything with which to compare it, so I'll leave that commentary to others here.
Welcome to the forum!
Last edited by russma on Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Russ M.
- Dr. Sketch-n-Etch
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 8871
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:46 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I have designed a slightly different take on the ring modulator, which I call the "multiplying modulator" (see the discussion here):
viewtopic.php?t=11937
At a certain pot and switch setting, it is a perfectly balanced modulator (four-quadrant multiplier or ring modulator), but it can be twiddled to two-quadrant operation (like a VCA) or something inbetween (unbalanced four-quadrant muliplication). It also has three-way rectifiers and attenuators on both signal and modulator inputs for extra modulation possibilities. Finally, the inputs can be DC or AC coupled. It can be used as a ring-mod in audio mode, or as a voltage-controlled inverting/non-inverting attenuator in CV mode. All in all a pretty useful little toy. It will be going into production in Euro format very very soon (shhh!).
viewtopic.php?t=11937
At a certain pot and switch setting, it is a perfectly balanced modulator (four-quadrant multiplier or ring modulator), but it can be twiddled to two-quadrant operation (like a VCA) or something inbetween (unbalanced four-quadrant muliplication). It also has three-way rectifiers and attenuators on both signal and modulator inputs for extra modulation possibilities. Finally, the inputs can be DC or AC coupled. It can be used as a ring-mod in audio mode, or as a voltage-controlled inverting/non-inverting attenuator in CV mode. All in all a pretty useful little toy. It will be going into production in Euro format very very soon (shhh!).
YuSynth Dual RM looks good! Only problem is that nobody sell it built with dotcom panel, ready to fit into the modular, yet.
If anybody knows tell it, please!
But I ask if these module will do the same result on sound character like two Arrick ringmods.
Any experience in ringmod different models?
Thanks a lot!
If anybody knows tell it, please!
But I ask if these module will do the same result on sound character like two Arrick ringmods.
Any experience in ringmod different models?
Thanks a lot!
You can... you can... Bring feeling!
-
JohnLRice
Welcome!
In addition to Russ' list, here are some modules that have ring modulator types of capabilities:
COTK C1631 Bode Modulator (marked as "not available right now")
Mos-Lab 970 Waveform Processor (marked as "no longer available")
There is also the stand-alone pedal: Moog MF-102
I currently own the MOTM-190 and Mos-Lab 970. Maybe I'll need to do a demo/comparison video . . . .
Edit: I also have the E560 Deflector Shield eurorack module which has a ring modulator mode:
[video][/video]
In addition to Russ' list, here are some modules that have ring modulator types of capabilities:
COTK C1631 Bode Modulator (marked as "not available right now")
Mos-Lab 970 Waveform Processor (marked as "no longer available")
There is also the stand-alone pedal: Moog MF-102
I currently own the MOTM-190 and Mos-Lab 970. Maybe I'll need to do a demo/comparison video . . . .
Edit: I also have the E560 Deflector Shield eurorack module which has a ring modulator mode:
[video][/video]
- Moog$FooL$
- Broke Dick Dog
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:54 am
- Location: Vancouver, BC.
-
JohnLRice
I'm currently working on a patch this week featuring my underused DotCom Ring Modulator. I used to get some outrageously wonderful deep bell tones from an ARP 2600 RM that I haven't quite been able to replicate on the DotCom. I've worked up some very nice mid range & high bells but I can't quite nail the low end as I could on the ARP. I've discovered that varying amounts of 'soft sync' has a pleasing effect to the overall sound.
Best,
dml
Best,
dml
I'm currently working on a patch this week featuring my underused DotCom Ring Modulator. I used to get some outrageously wonderful deep bell tones from an ARP 2600 RM that I haven't quite been able to replicate on the DotCom. I've worked up some very nice mid range & high bells but I can't quite nail the low end as I could on the ARP. I've discovered that varying amounts of 'soft sync' has a pleasing effect to the overall sound.
Best,
dml
Best,
dml
-
JohnLRice
-
JohnLRice
Hey, I forgot that I also have a MOTM-510 which is like a super ring modulator!
http://www.synthtech.com/motm510.html
http://www.synthtech.com/motm510.html
- sduck
- experimental use of gravity
- Posts: 14762
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:03 pm
- Location: Vortepexaion, TN, USA
Wow Russ, that looks great. I've been sitting on 4 of the original 281 pcb's for years - never could come up with a front panel that seemed right - yours looks OK. I've got a bunch of the new dual 281 pcb's on the way - maybe it's time to Make it happen?!
My favorite RM is the MFOS sonic multiplier - it has some neat features and really sounds good. Although like John, the 510 is really great sounding also, only problem is that it has so many other possibilities that just using the RM functions usually gets ignored.
My favorite RM is the MFOS sonic multiplier - it has some neat features and really sounds good. Although like John, the 510 is really great sounding also, only problem is that it has so many other possibilities that just using the RM functions usually gets ignored.
- kindredlost
- 5U skiff friendly
- Posts: 6285
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:45 pm
- Location: FEMA Region 6
It's a coincidence that I happened to be working on my Q116 RM this weekend. I tried plugging up a 100K pot to the INITIAL CONTROL header on the board just to see what would happen. It basically attenuates the X INPUT in a funny way. The mid point of the pot is full attenuation and either end is full signal. I can't determine whether it is inverting the signal or not (most likely not), but it sounds slightly different to my ear on either side of the pot. The Y INPUT is modified regardless of whether the X In signal is attenuated or not.
I don't really understand that either.
I later decided to add two pots directly as passive attenuators to the incoming signals. It does nothing really. Of course that is not surprising due to the way a balanced modulator works.
Here is a video of the first test with a pot on the Initial Control header.
[video][/video]
Here is a video of the goofy idea of adding two pots.
[video][/video]
There are 15 LFO's, 6 filters, 2 sequencers, 2 S&H's, 4 delays, a noise source, one EG and two oscillators for the Ring Modulator in this video live recording. A fun patch even though the RM mod was a bust.
I may just put a pot on the Initial Control header for the X Input and leave the Y Input attenuator where it is at. This might prove to be useful in some weird way.
As far as one RM sounding different from another, there are definitely differences. Sometimes it can be misleading to think the modulator is making a lot of difference if the signal sources are different too, but not all designs are the same electronically so it makes sense that there can be audible variations. I know the Arp RM's do sound different from the DotCom Q116 and the PAIA balanced modulators. There are many soft synth tools that have special characteristics too, but that is another subject.
-David
I later decided to add two pots directly as passive attenuators to the incoming signals. It does nothing really. Of course that is not surprising due to the way a balanced modulator works.
Here is a video of the first test with a pot on the Initial Control header.
[video][/video]
Here is a video of the goofy idea of adding two pots.
[video][/video]
There are 15 LFO's, 6 filters, 2 sequencers, 2 S&H's, 4 delays, a noise source, one EG and two oscillators for the Ring Modulator in this video live recording. A fun patch even though the RM mod was a bust.
I may just put a pot on the Initial Control header for the X Input and leave the Y Input attenuator where it is at. This might prove to be useful in some weird way.
As far as one RM sounding different from another, there are definitely differences. Sometimes it can be misleading to think the modulator is making a lot of difference if the signal sources are different too, but not all designs are the same electronically so it makes sense that there can be audible variations. I know the Arp RM's do sound different from the DotCom Q116 and the PAIA balanced modulators. There are many soft synth tools that have special characteristics too, but that is another subject.
-David
Hi guys! thanks for your feedback!
By the comments I can know that the ARP rinngmod is so special and recommend.
Thanks a lot Russ, for your offer, but my main problem is the panels. I have some dotcom blank panels but when you're talking about silkscreen... ugh..
I hate the silkscreen process, really... dirty, slow.. making screens, buy the ink... go to the here, then more far to buy next thing... no, no
One day discovered Schaeffer AG, but it seems that only can do works like MOTM panels not Moog style.
If there are any silkscreen master in the forum put your hand up please!
Yusynth have lot of desirable modules, I find the Saw animator so cool! 8_) but I will wait to find a silkscreen solution... one day maybe...
Sad too because the Saw animator from Cyndustries is no longer available in dotcom format and she doesn't reply my question if she will do another batch.
The wait continues.
By the comments I can know that the ARP rinngmod is so special and recommend.
Thanks a lot Russ, for your offer, but my main problem is the panels. I have some dotcom blank panels but when you're talking about silkscreen... ugh..
I hate the silkscreen process, really... dirty, slow.. making screens, buy the ink... go to the here, then more far to buy next thing... no, no
One day discovered Schaeffer AG, but it seems that only can do works like MOTM panels not Moog style.
If there are any silkscreen master in the forum put your hand up please!
Yusynth have lot of desirable modules, I find the Saw animator so cool! 8_) but I will wait to find a silkscreen solution... one day maybe...
The wait continues.
You can... you can... Bring feeling!
Rico had the front panel made from a FPD file on the ModularSynthPanels Yahoo group, by someone named "lexvortex".sduck wrote:Wow Russ, that looks great. I've been sitting on 4 of the original 281 pcb's for years - never could come up with a front panel that seemed right - yours looks OK. I've got a bunch of the new dual 281 pcb's on the way - maybe it's time to Make it happen?!....
And yeah, it's time to make it happen! The quadrature and "or's features are pretty cool.
Russ M.
- pugix
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 5174
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:23 am
- Location: Asheville, NC
- Contact:
There's a type of ring modulation (at least that's what I've heard it called) where two pulse waves are processed by digital XOR. I have a CGS Quad Logic gate, which is essentially a quad CMOS logic chip with buffers for analog IO. I put an XOR chip in it. I don't have a simple demo of it working by itself as a ring mod, but here's a recording where it's in there.
http://pugix.com/synth/two-ring-modulations/
That recording also features the MOTM-190 VCA in ring mod mode.
I didn't see a mention of the famous Blacet Klang Werk, probably because it needs repackaging for 5U. I've been on the verge of getting one to convert for 5U for years, but it hasn't bubbled up in priority.
http://pugix.com/synth/two-ring-modulations/
That recording also features the MOTM-190 VCA in ring mod mode.
I didn't see a mention of the famous Blacet Klang Werk, probably because it needs repackaging for 5U. I've been on the verge of getting one to convert for 5U for years, but it hasn't bubbled up in priority.
Richard
https://www.pugix.com
https://www.pugix.com
-
JohnLRice
That's a really cool sample, Richard! Thanks!pugix wrote:There's a type of ring modulation (at least that's what I've heard it called) where two pulse waves are processed by digital XOR. I have a CGS Quad Logic gate, which is essentially a quad CMOS logic chip with buffers for analog IO. I put an XOR chip in it. I don't have a simple demo of it working by itself as a ring mod, but here's a recording where it's in there.
http://pugix.com/synth/two-ring-modulations/
That recording also features the MOTM-190 VCA in ring mod mode.
I didn't see a mention of the famous Blacet Klang Werk, probably because it needs repackaging for 5U. I've been on the verge of getting one to convert for 5U for years, but it hasn't bubbled up in priority.
- Synthbuilder
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 3499
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:12 am
- Location: Cumbria, UK
That's what I thought too, which I why I did this:wutierson wrote:By the comments I can know that the ARP rinngmod is so special and recommend.![]()
http://www.oakleysound.com/ringmod.htm
Scheaffer will take synthesiser.com blanks and engrave them for you. The result is slightly different to a screen printed finish but it's pretty good. See this one:wutierson wrote: One day discovered Schaeffer AG, but it seems that only can do works like MOTM panels not Moog style.
This was a successful attempt at getting a Moogerfooger pedal into a dotcom format. Not mine but it looks pretty good.
Tony


