Our answer to modular polyphony: Supercritical Synthesizers
-
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:43 am
- Location: you can't tell me I'm not in space
Kind of. Digitally controlled oscillators produce a true analog wave, with some compromises. This is a great explanation of the principle: https://electricdruid.net/roland-juno-dcos/slumberjack wrote:sorry fot that noob question but i simply don't get it:
there are 16 single analoque oscillators 'in' this module?
Wow. That was an amazing read. I've learned TWO bits of history from this thread.Footkerchief wrote:Kind of. Digitally controlled oscillators produce a true analog wave, with some compromises. This is a great explanation of the principle: https://electricdruid.net/roland-juno-dcos/slumberjack wrote:sorry fot that noob question but i simply don't get it:
there are 16 single analoque oscillators 'in' this module?
"Now, I'm off to hook my cat's litterbox up to an envelope follower." --Aragorn23
thx for the link. but my question remains. are there 16 individual digital controlled but analoque generated waveforms being produced an the board of this module? one oscillator for each note? or is the some kind of magic happening?Footkerchief wrote:Kind of. Digitally controlled oscillators produce a true analog wave, with some compromises. This is a great explanation of the principle: https://electricdruid.net/roland-juno-dcos/slumberjack wrote:sorry fot that noob question but i simply don't get it:
there are 16 single analoque oscillators 'in' this module?
-
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 7917
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:29 am
- Location: Near the hole in the fence.
pinkflag16 wrote:Ringo wrote:
...which caused the death of two scientists. So the symbolism and the name are really not as bad as I thought.
Member *Ringo ..... can you hear yourself speak?Christopher Winkels wrote:Ringo wrote: a nuclear bomb which caused the death of two scientists. So the symbolism and the name are really not as bad as I thought.
I no longer respect your position and no longer feel it's ok to feel the way you do.
I speak for myself, and no-one else.
(... and unsubbed ...)

5U SEMI-MODULAR PERFORMANCE SYNTH NORMALIZING PROJECT
https://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewt ... highlight=
https://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewt ... highlight=
Some kind of magic happening, was the response when I asked about this earlier in the thread.slumberjack wrote:thx for the link. but my question remains. are there 16 individual digital controlled but analoque generated waveforms being produced an the board of this module? one oscillator for each note? or is the some kind of magic happening?
North Coast Synthesis Ltd.
Twitch stream (Mondays, 6pm Eastern)
If you tell me that your goal is systemic change toward radical acceptance, and I see that you treat those you perceive as lesser-than with the same kind of scorn and derision that pushed me toward this insular little subculture where I feel comfortable [. . .] then you’ve successfully convinced me that your acceptance is not radical and the change you want not systemic. - "When Nerds Collide"
Twitch stream (Mondays, 6pm Eastern)
If you tell me that your goal is systemic change toward radical acceptance, and I see that you treat those you perceive as lesser-than with the same kind of scorn and derision that pushed me toward this insular little subculture where I feel comfortable [. . .] then you’ve successfully convinced me that your acceptance is not radical and the change you want not systemic. - "When Nerds Collide"
to me the answer to your question was a bit unclear. i'd be fair enough for people like me with no specific knowledge of circuitry to get a straight yes or no response. we'll keep waiting for the guys to reply.mskala wrote:Some kind of magic happening, was the response when I asked about this earlier in the thread.slumberjack wrote:thx for the link. but my question remains. are there 16 individual digital controlled but analoque generated waveforms being produced an the board of this module? one oscillator for each note? or is the some kind of magic happening?
peace
To me, too! I was hoping the manufacturers would give specific details. But I think it's at least clear that it is not 16 fully independent analog cores; they said some significant parts are combined to allow a smaller number of integrators (maybe even just one integrator) to produce what is claimed to be an output equivalent to what would come from mixing the outputs of 16 independent cores. I'm not going to speculate on how that might work, given that there's too much speculation and too few facts in this thread already.slumberjack wrote:to me the answer to your question was a bit unclear.mskala wrote:Some kind of magic happening, was the response when I asked about this earlier in the thread.
North Coast Synthesis Ltd.
Twitch stream (Mondays, 6pm Eastern)
If you tell me that your goal is systemic change toward radical acceptance, and I see that you treat those you perceive as lesser-than with the same kind of scorn and derision that pushed me toward this insular little subculture where I feel comfortable [. . .] then you’ve successfully convinced me that your acceptance is not radical and the change you want not systemic. - "When Nerds Collide"
Twitch stream (Mondays, 6pm Eastern)
If you tell me that your goal is systemic change toward radical acceptance, and I see that you treat those you perceive as lesser-than with the same kind of scorn and derision that pushed me toward this insular little subculture where I feel comfortable [. . .] then you’ve successfully convinced me that your acceptance is not radical and the change you want not systemic. - "When Nerds Collide"
It does, the thru is an old school hardware MIDI thru, no processing, filtering etc.JES wrote:
The only really important thing for the Demon Core at first is that the MIDI through passes MPE data correctly.
Thanks! Yeah, it seems like an interesting idea to do MPE. I'm not promising anything, but I'll take a look once we've shipped the first batch of modules etc, i.e. I'll hopefully have a bit more time on my handsJES wrote:
So here's what I think I'd need with a Linnstrument to make MPE work with an oscillator module. If you pulled this off, I think it would be the first MPE oscillator in Eurorack.
...
Also happy to talk Linnstrument vs Seaboard if you are seriously considering one or the other (I own a Linnstrument and a Seaboard block).

I'm definitely open for recommendations on Linnstrument vs Seaboard etc. I've tried the Seaboard a couple of times in a store, but somehow didn't "get into it" immediately. But obviously a few minutes isn't probably enough to learn to appreciate it!
Whether it's a yes or no depends on how you exactly phrase your questionslumberjack wrote:to me the answer to your question was a bit unclear. i'd be fair enough for people like me with no specific knowledge of circuitry to get a straight yes or no response. we'll keep waiting for the guys to reply.mskala wrote:Some kind of magic happening, was the response when I asked about this earlier in the thread.slumberjack wrote:thx for the link. but my question remains. are there 16 individual digital controlled but analoque generated waveforms being produced an the board of this module? one oscillator for each note? or is the some kind of magic happening?
peace

"Does it physically have the same circuitry as 16 ordinary Juno style DCO's would have?": No.
"Does the output signal have the qualities expected of a sum of 16 Juno style DCO's: entirely aliasing free, spectrum extends up to the far ultrasonic, no quantisation of levels (i.e. waveform is analog by any definition of the word), exact quantized frequency/pitch (unless intentionally modulated)": Yes.
Anyway, we prefer to keep the detailed principle of operation a secret for know, as it's unique to us and we've spent quite some effort in developing this. We hope you understand, and let the sound speak for itself!
i didn't asked about 'the same circuitry' i was asking if there were 16 individual analoque osc (what the heck how ever they are controlled, clocked or if their handpicked on a asian backstreet market) as a soundsource. sorry for being pendantic it's just out of couriosity again, is that a yes or no?tisaalho wrote:Whether it's a yes or no depends on how you exactly phrase your questionslumberjack wrote:to me the answer to your question was a bit unclear. i'd be fair enough for people like me with no specific knowledge of circuitry to get a straight yes or no response. we'll keep waiting for the guys to reply.mskala wrote:Some kind of magic happening, was the response when I asked about this earlier in the thread.slumberjack wrote:thx for the link. but my question remains. are there 16 individual digital controlled but analoque generated waveforms being produced an the board of this module? one oscillator for each note? or is the some kind of magic happening?
peace![]()
"Does it physically have the same circuitry as 16 ordinary Juno style DCO's would have?": No.
"Does the output signal have the qualities expected of a sum of 16 Juno style DCO's: entirely aliasing free, spectrum extends up to the far ultrasonic, no quantisation of levels (i.e. waveform is analog by any definition of the word), exact quantized frequency/pitch (unless intentionally modulated)": Yes.
Anyway, we prefer to keep the detailed principle of operation a secret for know, as it's unique to us and we've spent quite some effort in developing this. We hope you understand, and let the sound speak for itself!
thanks for your answer in advance!
-
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:43 am
- Location: you can't tell me I'm not in space
If you don't mean "16 individual analoque osc" from the perspective of circuitry, for what purpose or from what perspective are you asking? There aren't 16 individual output jacks.slumberjack wrote: i didn't asked about 'the same circuitry' i was asking if there were 16 individual analoque osc (what the heck how ever they are controlled, clocked or if their handpicked on a asian backstreet market) as a soundsource. sorry for being pendantic it's just out of couriosity again, is that a yes or no?
thanks for your answer in advance!
Ok: here we go:tisaalho wrote:
I'm definitely open for recommendations on Linnstrument vs Seaboard etc. I've tried the Seaboard a couple of times in a store, but somehow didn't "get into it" immediately. But obviously a few minutes isn't probably enough to learn to appreciate it!
Seaboard is basically a keyboard crossed with a double bass. The squishiness is great but if you aren't a great keyboardist, it won't make you any better. I've played bass for 38 years, so when the Linnstrument came out with rows designed in 4ths, I was thrilled because I instantly understood the relationships among the notes. I wish for slightly more squishiness.
Once you learn to program the Linnstrument, you can do it in less than 5 minutes and don't need a computer. The Seaboards seem to need to be plugged into a computer. Roger Linn personally replies to support queries and usually in less than 24 hours. The Roli people took a week to let me know they'd get back to me in another week. Linnstrument is more expensive.
Or maybe you were asking about the musical usefulness of MPE in a modular context? I can answer that too...
But I won't derail the thread totally so PM me if you want to talk about it more. My opinions are just that. Others may have different ones.
"Now, I'm off to hook my cat's litterbox up to an envelope follower." --Aragorn23
I have said multiple times that I don´t like the name "demon core" either.Rex Coil 7 wrote:pinkflag16 wrote:Ringo wrote:
...which caused the death of two scientists. So the symbolism and the name are really not as bad as I thought.
Member *Ringo ..... can you hear yourself speak?Christopher Winkels wrote:Ringo wrote: a nuclear bomb which caused the death of two scientists. So the symbolism and the name are really not as bad as I thought.
I no longer respect your position and no longer feel it's ok to feel the way you do.
I speak for myself, and no-one else.
(... and unsubbed ...)

Also, I am not responsible for it. The potentially controversial name is the decision of the manufacturer.
However, if I had to choose between two ills, I would slightly prefer a reference to an historical, albeit deadly, nuclear experiment to a module with a supposedly demonic core. Both interpretations are unfortunate in my opinion. I think there is nothing wrong with my opinion.
It does not have 16 individual oscillator circuits. It has a single analog oscillator core producing the sound.slumberjack wrote:
i didn't asked about 'the same circuitry' i was asking if there were 16 individual analoque osc (what the heck how ever they are controlled, clocked or if their handpicked on a asian backstreet market) as a soundsource. sorry for being pendantic it's just out of couriosity again, is that a yes or no?
- southberry
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:56 pm
- Location: Toulouse
We'll try to get around to doing more demos, hopefully later this month. Is there anything specific that you'd like to hear demoed?southberry wrote:More Demo please ! I'm more interested by what I do with it that I can't do with others ! I don't really care about the technique to achieve this module ,
it looks like the sound source I was missing in my modular ....
- 2disbetter
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:40 pm
Thank you for the link and info. Fantastic information!Footkerchief wrote: Kind of. Digitally controlled oscillators produce a true analog wave, with some compromises. This is a great explanation of the principle: https://electricdruid.net/roland-juno-dcos/
Last edited by 2disbetter on Wed May 08, 2019 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- southberry
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:56 pm
- Location: Toulouse
I don't know , a proper video demo of the module must be great. I mean with "16 osc" it must be capable of a really fat sound. I'm a big fan of wave animator stuff and that kind of module to emulate the effects of multiple osc ... this module can save me a lot of HP / patch ... This is what I like in old vintage polysynth ala Polysix / Juno ....tisaalho wrote:We'll try to get around to doing more demos, hopefully later this month. Is there anything specific that you'd like to hear demoed?southberry wrote:More Demo please ! I'm more interested by what I do with it that I can't do with others ! I don't really care about the technique to achieve this module ,
it looks like the sound source I was missing in my modular ....