Bring on the random

Cwejman, Doepfer, Erica, MakeNoise, Mutable Instruments, TipTop Audio, Analogue Solutions, and much more! The world’s most popular format.
Be sure to look into OFFICIAL COMPANY FORA as well.
User avatar
Blairio
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 3559
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:50 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Post by Blairio »

err... NLC Sloth anyone? slow Random voltages on two axes (+/- 8 Volt, +/- 3 volt) with cycle times of around 15 minutes (for the quickest one!).

Great for modulating colour & timbre of Braids patches.

Very Cool.
User avatar
Pris
Common Wiggler
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:30 am
Location: Good old

Post by Pris »

If you ever get the chance to grab a Cwejman RG6, take it.
It is worth the high price.
R.U.Nuts
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2780
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:43 pm

Post by R.U.Nuts »

wsy wrote:
bernwerlin wrote:
R.U.Nuts wrote:S&H + white noise and expand from there...
:tu: Certainly one way to do it!

Also, Turing for easy to manipulate sequences.
Indeed. The SSF UltraRandom is two S&H channels, with white noise sources. Plus a clock normalized to drive the
S&Hs, plus slew limiters on the outputs, plus a pulse density output (gives you varying degrees of _time_ randomness,
like having the speed of your MATHS cycle-done itself driven by a S&H with controllable amounts of deviation. Plus
some vactrol action slew limiting. Plus some other stuff I forgot, but it's right there on the faceplate so no menu diving or
three-fingered Vulcan death pinch to make it happen.

The only thing it doesn't do is quantize the voltages out like a Sputnik. But it does other things the Sputnik doesn't.

It's a five-star module. Pair it with a Turing and you are good to go.

- Bill
Yeah you're right those dedicated random modules cram a lot of functionality in little space and ar probably less expensive than a number of smaller modules that can deliver the same functionality. The big downside of them is that they're not that open ended since a lot is normalized internally and not available as patch points. That's why I'd prefer a combination of smaller modules. For example take the possibilities a bread and butter S&H offers if you don't plug white noise into it's input. Example: plug the triangle wave of a VCO into the S&H input. Clock it with a trigger sequence. Run a division of your master clock into the hard-sync input of the VCO: poor man's random CV sequenzer. Use the square output of that VCO instead of the triangle and the master clock to trigger the S&H: poor man's random trigger sequencer
User avatar
wsy
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2728
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:20 pm
Location: near Boston Massachusetts USA

Post by wsy »

R.U.Nuts wrote: Yeah you're right those dedicated random modules cram a lot of functionality in little space and ar probably less expensive than a number of smaller modules that can deliver the same functionality. The big downside of them is that they're not that open ended since a lot is normalized internally and not available as patch points. That's why I'd prefer a combination of smaller modules. For example take the possibilities a bread and butter S&H offers if you don't plug white noise into it's input. Example: plug the triangle wave of a VCO into the S&H input. Clock it with a trigger sequence. Run a division of your master clock into the hard-sync input of the VCO: poor man's random CV sequenzer. Use the square output of that VCO instead of the triangle and the master clock to trigger the S&H: poor man's random trigger sequencer
The SSF URA is good that way. Lots of normals with interrupting jacks.

You have incoming patch points for S/H A and B inputs (white noise is normalled to them), you have a clock FM
input and and the clock normals to an external clock input; the electronic slew normals to S/H B, the vactrol slew normals
to the random pulse generator (with knob and jack), and a third slew comes from a noise source without a normal, but you can influence
it in direction and probability which
is what it's supposed to be .

I'm probably getting something wrong as well.

The manual is here: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... ev1.00.pdf

The URA is one of the few modules I have that I would change NOTHING on (the Chronoblob is another. And maybe MATHS. But that's pretty much it...).

- Bill
"Life is short. But we can always buy longer patch cords" - Savage
User avatar
geremyf
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:01 pm
Location: Boston

Post by geremyf »

Don't forget The URA clock tracks 1V/octave as well!
R.U.Nuts
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2780
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:43 pm

Post by R.U.Nuts »

wsy wrote:
R.U.Nuts wrote: Yeah you're right those dedicated random modules cram a lot of functionality in little space and ar probably less expensive than a number of smaller modules that can deliver the same functionality. The big downside of them is that they're not that open ended since a lot is normalized internally and not available as patch points. That's why I'd prefer a combination of smaller modules. For example take the possibilities a bread and butter S&H offers if you don't plug white noise into it's input. Example: plug the triangle wave of a VCO into the S&H input. Clock it with a trigger sequence. Run a division of your master clock into the hard-sync input of the VCO: poor man's random CV sequenzer. Use the square output of that VCO instead of the triangle and the master clock to trigger the S&H: poor man's random trigger sequencer
The SSF URA is good that way. Lots of normals with interrupting jacks.

You have incoming patch points for S/H A and B inputs (white noise is normalled to them), you have a clock FM
input and and the clock normals to an external clock input; the electronic slew normals to S/H B, the vactrol slew normals
to the random pulse generator (with knob and jack), and a third slew comes from a noise source without a normal, but you can influence
it in direction and probability which
is what it's supposed to be .

I'm probably getting something wrong as well.

The manual is here: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... ev1.00.pdf

The URA is one of the few modules I have that I would change NOTHING on (the Chronoblob is another. And maybe MATHS. But that's pretty much it...).

- Bill
Yes, just had a quick look at the manual. Great module. But I'd still prefer two independent S&Hs because you can clock them from different sources.
User avatar
wsy
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2728
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:20 pm
Location: near Boston Massachusetts USA

Post by wsy »

geremyf wrote:Don't forget The URA clock tracks 1V/octave as well!
That's right; it's also a VCO/LFO. ::-)

You could do a lot worse and still have a really nice module. :-)

- Bill
"Life is short. But we can always buy longer patch cords" - Savage
nigel
Ultra Wiggler
Posts: 937
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:49 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by nigel »

R.U.Nuts wrote: Yes, just had a quick look at the manual. Great module. But I'd still prefer two independent S&Hs because you can clock them from different sources.
If I'm understanding the demo, you can input a separate clock for the second S/H. So, yeah, it has that too!
User avatar
geremyf
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1368
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:01 pm
Location: Boston

Post by geremyf »

And there is actually a third S&H with the toggle A/B output.
R.U.Nuts
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2780
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:43 pm

Post by R.U.Nuts »

nigel wrote:
R.U.Nuts wrote: Yes, just had a quick look at the manual. Great module. But I'd still prefer two independent S&Hs because you can clock them from different sources.
If I'm understanding the demo, you can input a separate clock for the second S/H. So, yeah, it has that too!
Yes you're right. I checked that again. But S&H A is permanently hardwired to the internal clock so no external clock for S&H A.
User avatar
Roy72
Ultra Wiggler
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:35 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Roy72 »

R.U.Nuts wrote:
nigel wrote:
R.U.Nuts wrote: Yes, just had a quick look at the manual. Great module. But I'd still prefer two independent S&Hs because you can clock them from different sources.
If I'm understanding the demo, you can input a separate clock for the second S/H. So, yeah, it has that too!
Yes you're right. I checked that again. But S&H A is permanently hardwired to the internal clock so no external clock for S&H A.
But the Toggle A/B can be clocked synced, so you can get 2 synced and one that is never synced.
User avatar
beepbeep
Common Wiggler
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by beepbeep »

The random gods have spoken. A Wogglebug v2 will soon be en route. I'll probably try some other randoms as well, but this will give me a good start. Thanks everyone.
beepbeep wrote:I'm leaning toward the Nano Rand as I'm trying to keep my eurorack small. The Sputnick looks cool to but is way to big. I may stick to the random theme and see what comes my way used.
User avatar
BLogic12
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 5229
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:17 am
Location: Milwaukee WI

Post by BLogic12 »

wogglebug mk2 is a solid choice.

there was this thread on random recently too, check it for more perspectives:
viewtopic.php?t=171460&highlight=
User avatar
strangegravity
A Big Knob
Posts: 1983
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 12:01 pm
Location: Cincinnati

Post by strangegravity »

R.U.Nuts wrote:S&H + white noise and expand from there...
I second this. Instead of a multi-function module why not accumulate the foundation blocks of random. Then you have more patch options.

S&H, noise, quantizers, slope detectors, and complex LFOs. I have a PHG Chain Reactor. I can spin up some wonky LFOs or Triggers. I also have an Ultra Wave LFO which has noise and random as LFO wave choices.
User avatar
richc90
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1188
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 11:03 am
Location: Berlin

Post by richc90 »

As much as I love my wogglebugs, I crave more random: next on my shopping lists are the A149/1-2 and maybe a sloth.
User avatar
memes_33
Ultra Wiggler
Posts: 956
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:40 pm
Location: Oaktown

Post by memes_33 »

spent some time with the URA cutsheet on a flight yesterday- certainly more intuitive than PTG. might have to figure out a way to get this thang in my rack now!
User avatar
beepbeep
Common Wiggler
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by beepbeep »

richc90, but in your signature you are selling a wogglebug? :sadbanana:
richc90 wrote:As much as I love my wogglebugs, I crave more random: next on my shopping lists are the A149/1-2 and maybe a sloth.
User avatar
richc90
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1188
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 11:03 am
Location: Berlin

Post by richc90 »

note the plural: i have two at the moment and am selling one to allow me to get some different flavours of random.
User avatar
beepbeep
Common Wiggler
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by beepbeep »

R.U.Nuts wrote:S&H + white noise and expand from there...
I didn't realize until last night that Disting's S&H had noise built in, so I was thinking that I couldn't do this, but it does have noise. :bananaguitar:

Really dug it, I alternated between using the e355 and a plain as clock and used the random out, well everywhere. Still looking forward to the wogglebug as I want to free up the Disting, but this is a good start.
User avatar
beepbeep
Common Wiggler
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by beepbeep »

richc90 wrote:note the plural: i have two at the moment and am selling one to allow me to get some different flavours of random.
Just teasing you man. The Sloth is on my short list as well.
User avatar
beepbeep
Common Wiggler
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by beepbeep »

Does any use Disting's Shift Register Random Dual Triggers? Just read about it in another thread, next on my tryout list.
Post Reply

Return to “1U & 3U Eurorack Modules”