have you paid for clouds yet?monstrinho wrote:Please put me down for:
1 x Module Tester
1 x Elements
1 x Streams
1 x Frames
...plus 1 x Clouds from the other thread.
edit - don't worry, i've found you
And just for further comparison, here is an 0603 resistor, the same size as the capacitors in borfo's' photo below, next to an STM32F013 processor chip as used in Braids, Tides, Frames, Yarns, Peaks and Streams. The pins on the STM32F4 processors used in Clouds and Elements are the same size, there is just more of them (64 instead of 48).borfo wrote:Just FYI, here's what a tape of 0603 capacitors looks like. With grains of rice and a nickel for scale. Happy soldering!


there are lots of smt warnings throughout the thread - a page or two back i tried to shatter any illusions these are automatically cheap projects to make too, just because they're diyJonachi wrote:haha, pretty much feel the same. This thread should have som disclaimer och warning ingo about the massive SMT soldering needed. That being said I'm willing to try it.fcd72 wrote:This is gonna be the TITANIC of DIY Group Buys…..
indeed. at any rate there's no reason to over-mystify things. clearly, the "DIY = through-hole" equation mostly and needlessly was/is just holding things back.adam wrote:
still, i'd say you're all grown ups

Then, may i be the heretic to ask how many of you successfully managed to complete a 0603 pitched project with some hundred components?adam wrote: there are lots of smt warnings throughout the thread - a page or two back i tried to shatter any illusions these are automatically cheap projects to make too, just because they're diy
still, i'd say you're all grown ups - it's pretty clear there are some seasoned diy'ers here and probably engineers too
I agree that SMT can be perfectly consistent with DIY, if the project is designed for hand-soldered SMT from the outset. My point is that these MI designs were never intended for DIY, and thus the component and importantly the pad sizes make some of the components on them very challenging to solder, even for experienced SMT constructors. Anyway, it will be interesting to see how people get on. I'm sure some will succeed, but I wonder how many.mxmxmx wrote: indeed. at any rate there's no reason to over-mystify things. clearly, the "DIY = through-hole" equation mostly and needlessly was/is just holding things back.
sure, you'd probably go about things slightly differently when aiming at DIY. but we're not talking about BGAs or what; broadly speaking it wouldn't make things much easier if it were, say, entirely 0805. the "never intended for DIY" thing is slightly misleading, too, in as much assembly isn't all there is to it. plainly there's just no way to avoid SMD when designing these kinds of module. from that perspective, you might as well say that the stuff is rather DIY friendly. codecs come in rather more unpleasant packages than, say, a WM8731.bennelong.bicyclist wrote:I agree that SMT can be perfectly consistent with DIY, if the project is designed for hand-soldered SMT from the outset. My point is that these MI designs were never intended for DIY, and thus the component and importantly the pad sizes make some of the components on them very challenging to solder, even for experienced SMT constructors. Anyway, it will be interesting to see how people get on. I'm sure some will succeed, but I wonder how many.mxmxmx wrote: indeed. at any rate there's no reason to over-mystify things. clearly, the "DIY = through-hole" equation mostly and needlessly was/is just holding things back.